Auvik network monitoring: review, pricing, and alternatives

Name: Auvik — ITOpsClub Editorial Review
Item: Auvik
Author: ITOpsClub Editorial

Auvik uses per billable network device per month (custom quote) pricing, runs on cloud, supports Windows, Linux, and 14-day free trial (no credit card required).

Auvik is a cloud-delivered network monitoring and management platform built specifically for MSPs and internal IT teams managing distributed network infrastructure. It deploys via a lightweight collector agent that auto-discovers every device on the network — routers, switches, firewalls, servers, access points, printers — and builds a live topology map without manual configuration. The platform is designed to give engineers full network visibility within hours of deployment, not weeks.

Auvik's primary competitive positioning is against tools that require significant manual setup to produce the same network visibility. Where PRTG requires sensors and templates, and SolarWinds NPM requires discovery scans and node licensing decisions, Auvik's automated discovery and map generation work out of the box. That speed advantage is most pronounced for MSPs that onboard new client networks frequently — each new client comes online without manual device enumeration or topology drawing.

Visit Auvik website Start free trial Auvik pricing Auvik alternatives

Written by RajatFact-checked by Chandrasmita

Editorial policy: How we review software · How rankings work · Sponsored disclosure

Pricing model

Per billable network device per month (custom quote)

Deployment

Cloud

Supported OS

Windows, Linux

Trial status

14-day free trial (no credit card required)

Review rating

Not surfaced

Vendor

Auvik

Auvik pricing

Auvik's per-device pricing model bills against what the company calls 'billable devices' — a defined subset of the managed network. Routers, switches, firewalls, and servers are billable. Wireless access points, printers, UPS devices, NAS appliances, and most IP phones are excluded from the count.

For an MSP managing a typical SMB client network with 5 switches, 2 firewalls, 1 router, and 15 servers, the billable count might be 23 devices — the rest of the hardware on that network does not increase the invoice. Understanding exactly which device types Auvik classifies as billable is the most important pricing step before requesting a quote.

The Essentials-to-Performance upgrade decision is the tier question that matters most. Essentials covers core monitoring: discovery, topology maps, device status, SNMP polling, alerting, and remote SSH/Telnet access to managed devices.

Performance adds the features that drive the majority of day-to-day operational value: NetFlow and sFlow traffic analysis for bandwidth visibility, syslog collection and search, and automated configuration backup with drift detection that alerts when device configs change unexpectedly. For most MSPs, Performance is the operational tier and Essentials is the trial tier — most teams that convert to paid move to Performance within the first contract period.

View Auvik pricing

Essentials: Custom quote (Includes network discovery, topology maps, device monitoring, alerting, remote SSH/Telnet access, and basic reporting. Excludes traffic analysis, syslog, and config backup.)

Performance: Custom quote (Adds NetFlow/sFlow traffic analysis, syslog collection and search, configuration backup and drift detection, and enhanced reporting. Full feature set.)

Verified from the official pricing page on March 17, 2026. View source

What stands out about Auvik

Auvik earns its position on the shortlist for MSPs that onboard new networks regularly and need consistent visibility without spending engineering time on setup. The automated topology mapping and PSA integrations are genuinely differentiated — no competing product in this price range handles network discovery and documentation as quickly.

Auvik is best for

MSPs managing multiple client networks who need consistent network visibility without manual topology setup per engagement, and for internal IT teams supporting distributed offices where the network topology changes frequently enough that a static diagram is always out of date. It is particularly strong when the team already runs an RMM for endpoint management and needs a dedicated network monitoring layer that integrates with PSA tools for ticket creation and documentation.

Why Auvik stands out

What makes Auvik stand out is the combination of automated discovery speed and network topology accuracy. Most competing tools require an engineer to define discovery scopes, configure SNMP credentials per device type, and manually validate the resulting device list. Auvik's collector deploys, discovers the network, and produces a navigable topology map in hours.

Commercial fit for Auvik

Auvik fits MSPs best when the practice has enough client density that per-device pricing distributes efficiently across the managed base — typically 200 or more total billable devices across clients. Below that threshold, the per-device economics are harder to justify against simpler alternatives. For internal IT teams, the commercial fit question is whether Auvik's network-specific depth is worth a separate tool budget alongside the RMM and monitoring tools already in the stack.

What users think

“Network topology mapping and traffic analysis delivered from the cloud, with automatic discovery that works across most switching and routing vendors via SNMP. MSPs and mid-market network teams get the most value when they need consistent visibility across multiple sites without deploying per-site monitoring infrastructure.”

Read full review

In depth

Auvik is best evaluated in the context of the specific it operations software workflows your team is trying to standardize or improve.

Shortlist quality depends less on surface-level feature parity and more on how well Auvik fits your deployment preferences, reporting expectations, and the amount of day-to-day operational ownership your team can absorb. Use this page to understand product fit before moving into direct vendor comparisons.

Test whether Auvik fits the current environment and OS mix.
Validate the vendor’s pricing mechanics against real rollout assumptions.
Check whether the platform solves the workflows that matter in the first 90 days.

Auvik features

Automated network discovery and topology mapping

Auvik's collector agent deploys on a Windows or Linux host within the managed network and begins discovery immediately using a combination of SNMP, CDP, LLDP, and ARP table analysis. It identifies every reachable device, resolves layer-2 and layer-3 relationships between them, and renders a live topology diagram showing physical and logical connections. - The map updates continuously — when a device goes offline, a new device joins the network, or a link changes state, the topology reflects it within minutes.

Network device monitoring and alerting

Auvik monitors routers, switches, firewalls, access points, servers, and other SNMP-capable devices through continuous polling. Monitored metrics include device availability (up/down status), CPU utilization, memory usage, interface throughput, interface error rates, and BGP/OSPF routing protocol state for devices that expose it via SNMP. - Alert thresholds are configurable per device or per device type, with alerts delivered via email, SMS, and integrations with PSA platforms for automatic ticket creation.

Traffic analysis with NetFlow, sFlow, and IPFIX

The Performance tier includes full NetFlow, sFlow, and IPFIX analysis for devices that export flow data. Auvik collects flow records from capable routers and switches, aggregates them, and presents bandwidth consumption by application, conversation pair (source IP to destination IP), and protocol. - The traffic analysis interface shows top talkers, top applications, and bandwidth trends over time — giving the team a clear answer to 'what is consuming the bandwidth?' without requiring a separate flow collector or traffic analysis tool.

Configuration backup and drift detection

Auvik automatically backs up running configurations for supported network devices — Cisco IOS, Juniper, Palo Alto, Fortinet, and many other vendors — via SSH and Telnet. Backups run on a schedule and also trigger on detected configuration changes. - This passive config audit capability is operationally valuable for environments where change management is informal or junior staff have device access.

Remote device management

Auvik includes a browser-based terminal that opens SSH or Telnet sessions to managed devices directly from the Auvik interface, without requiring a jump server, VPN, or locally installed terminal emulator. Engineers can access any router, switch, or firewall in the managed network from the browser — useful for troubleshooting or configuration changes during incidents when direct network access is constrained. - Session activity is logged in Auvik's audit trail, which records which engineer accessed which device and when.

Multi-tenant MSP dashboard and client management

Auvik's multi-tenant interface is designed around the MSP operational model, where a single team manages networks for many separate clients simultaneously. Each client has its own isolated network environment within Auvik, with separate credentials, separate topology maps, and separate alerting configurations. - The MSP-level dashboard provides a unified view across all clients — showing which client networks have active alerts, which devices are offline, and which need attention — without requiring engineers to switch between separate accounts or browser tabs. - Role-based access control allows MSPs to grant client-level staff access to their own network view without exposing other clients' data.

Syslog collection and search

Auvik's Performance tier includes a syslog receiver that collects log messages from network devices and makes them searchable within the Auvik interface. Network devices generate syslog for interface state changes, authentication events, routing protocol adjacency changes, spanning tree topology changes, and a wide range of other operational events. - The syslog search is accessible per-device or across all devices in the managed environment, with time-range filtering that makes it practical for post-incident review.

Pros and cons of Auvik

This is the point in the evaluation where buyers should separate what sounds strong in the demo from what will still matter after implementation, reporting setup, and day-two administration are real.

Strengths

These are the strengths most likely to keep Auvik in the shortlist once the team starts comparing practical fit, not just feature breadth.

Automated discovery eliminates manual topology setup

Auvik's collector finds every device on the network and builds the topology map without manual device entry or credential configuration per device. For MSPs onboarding a new client, this reduces what would be hours of discovery work to a deployment and wait cycle measured in minutes. The topology also stays current automatically — no outdated network diagrams from six months ago.

PSA integration depth is best-in-class for MSPs

Auvik integrates natively with ConnectWise Manage, Autotask, Kaseya BMS, HaloPSA, and IT Glue, among others. Alert-to-ticket creation, client-network mapping, and documentation sync are bidirectional and reliable. MSPs running these PSA stacks get alert-driven ticket creation that populates the correct client queue without manual routing — a meaningful reduction in MSP coordination overhead at scale.

Traffic analysis requires no separate flow collector

NetFlow and sFlow analysis is built into the Performance tier — there is no separate flow collector tool to deploy and maintain. For MSPs that would otherwise use ntopng, ManageEngine NetFlow Analyzer, or similar tools to diagnose bandwidth issues, consolidating traffic analysis into Auvik's interface reduces both tooling cost and the context-switching overhead of working across multiple systems.

Configuration backup is passive and automatic

Auvik backs up device configs on schedule and triggers additional backups on detected changes — without any workflow engineering required. The diff-based change alert gives teams a reliable config audit trail without implementing a separate configuration management system. For environments subject to audit requirements or with informal change management practices, this is meaningful compliance assurance at low operational cost.

14-day free trial with no credit card gives real evaluation time

Auvik's trial is an unconstrained product evaluation — full feature access for 14 days with no payment information required. For MSPs, this is enough time to deploy the collector on one or two client networks, run discovery, validate the topology map, and test the PSA integration. The trial scope is sufficient to judge whether Auvik fits the practice before any contract conversation.

Limitations

These are the points worth pressing in pricing calls, technical validation, and rollout planning before the team treats the product as a safe choice.

Cloud-only deployment excludes organizations with on-premises requirements

Auvik is entirely SaaS — there is no on-premises deployment option. All network data flows through Auvik's cloud infrastructure. For regulated industries with hard data residency requirements or organizations that cannot route telemetry through a third-party cloud, Auvik is excluded regardless of its feature strength.

Pricing is opaque without a direct sales conversation

Auvik publishes no dollar pricing. Buyers cannot self-qualify on commercial fit without contacting sales — which gives the vendor pricing leverage before the buyer has established a benchmark. The MSP community has established informal ranges through Reddit and forum discussions, but official pricing requires a vendor conversation.

Application and server monitoring depth is limited

Auvik monitors servers at the SNMP or agent level — CPU, memory, disk, and network interface metrics — but does not provide application performance monitoring, container visibility, database query analysis, or cloud infrastructure observability. Teams that need server-layer depth alongside network monitoring will still need a separate APM or infrastructure monitoring tool. Datadog and LogicMonitor both cover network and server layers with greater depth under a single subscription.

Customization depth is lower than PRTG or Zabbix

Auvik's sensor library and alerting model are more opinionated and less flexible than PRTG or Zabbix. Engineers who need custom SNMP OID monitoring for unusual device metrics, or who want to build complex alert correlation logic, will find Auvik's configuration surface more constrained. PRTG's sensor-based model and Zabbix's template system provide deeper customization at the cost of significantly more setup time.

Per-device pricing compounds at high device counts

The per-billable-device model is straightforward for small-to-mid MSPs but becomes a commercial constraint as device counts scale into the thousands. MSPs managing large enterprise clients with hundreds of switches and routers per site may find that Auvik's per-device total approaches or exceeds alternatives that charge per technician or per site. Run the full device count projection before committing to multi-year terms.

Auvik deployment, integrations, and platform coverage

Auvik deploys through a collector agent installed on a Windows Server or Linux host within each managed network. The collector needs outbound connectivity to Auvik's cloud platform on TCP 443 — no inbound firewall rules are required. Discovery uses SNMP community strings or SNMPv3 credentials for device polling; these credentials are entered in the Auvik interface and distributed to the collector automatically. A typical collector deployment and initial discovery cycle completes in under two hours for a standard SMB network.

SNMP credential configuration is the most common setup friction point. Devices that do not have SNMP enabled or that use non-standard community strings will show in the topology as unmanaged nodes with limited visibility.

Before deploying Auvik in a new client environment, it is worth confirming that SNMP is enabled on routers, switches, and firewalls, and that community strings or SNMPv3 credentials are documented. Auvik's device support library covers hundreds of vendor models — Cisco, Juniper, Palo Alto, Fortinet, Ubiquiti, Meraki, HP/Aruba — but device-specific monitoring depth varies by how much each vendor exposes via SNMP.

PSA integration setup requires creating an API key in the PSA platform and entering it in Auvik's integration settings. ConnectWise and Autotask integrations are the most mature — alert-to-ticket routing, company mapping (matching Auvik client to PSA company record), and configuration item sync have all been stable features. IT Glue integration syncs Auvik-discovered network devices into IT Glue documentation automatically, which is a substantial time saving for MSPs that maintain manual IT Glue device records today.

Before you book a demo

Auvik free trial, demo, and buying motion

Auvik's evaluation path is cleaner than most network monitoring tools because the free trial delivers real network discovery rather than a sandbox demo. The practical sequence is: deploy the collector on a representative client or internal network, let discovery run, validate the topology map, test alerting with a simulated device-down event, and confirm the PSA integration creates tickets in the right queue. If those four tests pass, the product is operationally validated for that environment type.

Deploy the collector on the most complex client network in the portfolio — not the simplest. The trial should test Auvik under real conditions: mixed device vendors, multiple VLANs, a mix of SNMP-capable and non-SNMP devices. If the topology map is accurate for the complex environment, it will be accurate everywhere.

Test the PSA integration during the trial period, not after signing. Alert-to-ticket routing, client mapping, and configuration item sync are all testable in the 14-day trial. An integration that does not work cleanly in the trial will require engineering time to fix in production.

Request a quote that includes the full billable device count for all current clients, not just one test network. Auvik pricing is most favorable at volume — a quote for 50 devices looks very different from a quote for 500 devices. Get the realistic number before evaluating commercial fit.

Compare the Essentials-to-Performance price difference directly against the cost of adding a separate NetFlow analysis tool. If the delta between tiers is less than the tooling and operational cost of maintaining a standalone flow collector, Performance justifies itself before the first traffic analysis use case.

Frequently asked questions about Auvik for Network Monitoring

Is Auvik any good?

Auvik is well-regarded in the MSP community specifically for its automated network discovery and topology mapping. G2 and Capterra reviews consistently rate it highly for ease of deployment and network visualization. The most common criticism is pricing opacity — no published rates — and limited depth for server and application monitoring compared to broader observability platforms. For pure network monitoring, it is one of the strongest purpose-built options in its category.

What are the benefits of using Auvik?

The primary benefits are: automated network discovery without manual device enumeration, live topology maps that update as the network changes, built-in NetFlow traffic analysis without a separate collector, automated configuration backup with change detection, and deep PSA integration for MSP workflows. The collective benefit is network visibility delivered in hours rather than days of setup, at a manageable operational cost for MSPs managing multiple client networks.

What companies use Auvik?

Auvik's primary customer base is managed service providers — IT companies that manage networks for multiple clients. It is also used by internal IT teams in mid-market companies managing distributed office networks. Auvik does not publish a named customer list, but it is widely used in the MSP sector and is frequently mentioned in MSP-community discussions on Reddit, MSPGeek, and ConnectWise partner forums.

What is the difference between NinjaOne and Auvik?

NinjaOne is an RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management) platform focused on endpoint management — managing servers, workstations, and laptops with patch management, remote access, and endpoint monitoring. Auvik is a network monitoring platform focused on network infrastructure — routers, switches, firewalls, and access points. The two tools are complementary, not competing: MSPs commonly run NinjaOne for endpoint management and Auvik for network monitoring in parallel. If forced to choose one, NinjaOne covers more total use cases but has shallower network monitoring depth than Auvik.

Does Auvik have a free trial?

Yes — Auvik offers a 14-day free trial with no credit card required. The trial includes full feature access across both the Essentials and Performance tiers. This is sufficient time to deploy the collector, run network discovery, evaluate the topology map, test alerting, and validate PSA integration before any commercial commitment.

What is the difference between Auvik Essentials and Performance?

Essentials covers network discovery, topology maps, device monitoring and alerting, and remote SSH/Telnet access. Performance adds NetFlow and sFlow traffic analysis, syslog collection and search, and automated device configuration backup with drift detection. For most MSPs, Performance is the operational tier — the traffic analysis and config backup features drive the majority of day-to-day network management value.

Can Auvik monitor services and applications?

Auvik includes basic HTTP/HTTPS service monitoring in the Performance tier, which checks whether a URL is reachable and measures response time. It does not provide deep application performance monitoring, database monitoring, or cloud infrastructure observability. Teams that need application-layer monitoring alongside network monitoring typically pair Auvik with a dedicated APM tool (Datadog, New Relic) or use a broader platform like LogicMonitor that covers both network and application layers.

Auvik alternatives worth comparing

If Auvik is on the shortlist, the comparisons worth running before the decision hardens are against tools that serve the same buyer — MSPs and IT teams managing distributed network infrastructure — but with different approaches to pricing, deployment, or monitoring depth.

Nagios XI

Nagios XI gives teams a way to evaluate server monitoring software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.

Open alternative

SolarWinds NPM

SolarWinds NPM targets larger enterprise environments than Auvik. It has deeper SNMP monitoring breadth, more sophisticated network performance analytics, and a mature on-premises deployment model with a long installed base. The tradeoffs are significant setup complexity, higher cost, and a licensing model that requires careful node count management. SolarWinds NPM is not MSP-optimized — it does not have a multi-tenant dashboard or PSA integrations comparable to Auvik's. Compare SolarWinds NPM when the environment is a single large enterprise with complex networking requirements and dedicated network engineering staff.

Open alternative

ManageEngine OpManager

ManageEngine OpManager is a comprehensive network and infrastructure monitoring platform with published pricing starting significantly below Auvik's estimated rates. It covers network devices, servers, VMs, and applications in a single platform. OpManager has more monitoring breadth but requires more implementation effort than Auvik — discovery, alerting, and reporting setup all require manual configuration. Compare ManageEngine OpManager when a single-platform approach covering both network and server infrastructure matters, or when published pricing and a lower initial cost are priorities.

Open alternative

Checkmk

Checkmk gives teams a way to evaluate server monitoring software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.

Open alternative

Site24x7

Site24x7 gives teams a way to evaluate server monitoring software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.

Open alternative

See all Auvik alternatives

Head-to-head comparisons

Open the comparison pages once Auvik makes the shortlist.

Comparison

PRTG vs Auvik

PRTG vs Auvik compares fit, tradeoffs, and operational strengths for IT buyers.

Open comparison

Comparison

Auvik vs Checkmk

Auvik vs Checkmk compares fit, tradeoffs, and operational strengths for IT buyers.

Open comparison

Comparison

Auvik vs Domotz

Auvik vs Domotz compares fit, tradeoffs, and operational strengths for IT buyers.

Open comparison

Comparison

Auvik vs Datadog Infrastructure

Auvik vs Datadog Infrastructure compares fit, tradeoffs, and operational strengths for IT buyers.

Open comparison

Related buyer guides

Use the surrounding category research before this tool becomes the default answer.

Buyer guide

Network Monitoring Tools Open Source

Open-source network monitoring tools can offer flexibility and lower license cost, but buyers should weigh that against implementation effort, support expectations, and total ownership.

Read article

Sources

These are the public references, pricing pages, and editorial inputs used to support this page. Readers should still confirm final commercial or product details directly with the vendor when the decision becomes real.

pricing · verified Mar 17, 2026

Official pricing page

Auvik pricing reference

Continue through this software cluster

Use the linked pages below to move from the product profile into pricing, alternatives, category context, comparisons, glossary terms, and research.