ITOpsClub logo
ITOpsClub
Find
SolarWinds Patch Manager logo

SolarWinds Patch Manager: patch management review for Windows IT teams

SolarWinds

SolarWinds Patch Manager uses per node, subscription (annual) or perpetual license with maintenance pricing, runs on on-prem, supports Windows, and 30-day free trial.

SolarWinds Patch Manager is not a standalone patch management platform. It is an extension layer that sits on top of Microsoft WSUS or SCCM and adds third-party application patching, pre-built update packages, compliance reporting, and advanced scheduling to the patching infrastructure you already run. If you do not have WSUS or SCCM deployed, SolarWinds Patch Manager has nothing to extend. That dependency is the single most important thing to understand before evaluating it.

Subscription licensing starts at approximately $1,584 per year for 250 nodes and scales through 11 tiers up to 110,000 nodes. Perpetual licensing with first-year maintenance starts higher — around $3,617 for 250 nodes. A 30-day free trial is available. The product is Windows-only: no macOS, no Linux, no mobile device coverage. Teams with mixed-OS environments or cloud-native infrastructure should evaluate Automox, NinjaOne, or Action1 instead.

Visit SolarWinds Patch Manager websiteSolarWinds Patch Manager pricingSolarWinds Patch Manager alternatives
Written by RajatFact-checked by Chandrasmita

Editorial policy: How we review software · How rankings work · Sponsored disclosure

Pricing model

Per node, subscription (annual) or perpetual license with maintenance

Deployment

On-prem

Supported OS

Windows

Trial status

30-day free trial

Review rating

Not surfaced

Vendor

SolarWinds

SolarWinds Patch Manager pricing

SolarWinds Patch Manager offers two licensing models: subscription (annual) and perpetual (one-time license with recurring maintenance). Subscription pricing for 250 nodes starts at approximately $1,584 per year based on reseller pricing. Perpetual licensing for the same 250-node tier starts at approximately $3,617 including first-year maintenance — renewal maintenance runs roughly 20-25% of the license cost annually. Eleven node tiers are available, scaling from 250 nodes up to 110,000 nodes.

The per-node cost decreases at higher tiers but the absolute cost grows substantially. A 500-node subscription runs approximately $2,700 per year; a 1,000-node subscription approaches $4,000. At enterprise scale — 10,000+ nodes — the product remains more cost-effective per node than most cloud-native alternatives, but only if the team already operates WSUS or SCCM infrastructure. If that infrastructure does not exist, the total cost of ownership includes standing up and maintaining WSUS servers, which erases the per-node pricing advantage.

Compare the SolarWinds subscription cost against Automox (approximately $3 per device per month for the full platform, cloud-native, no WSUS dependency) and Action1 (free for up to 200 endpoints, paid tiers starting at $2 per endpoint per month).

At 250 nodes, Automox runs roughly $9,000 per year and Action1 roughly $6,000 — both significantly more expensive than SolarWinds on price alone. But both include cross-OS coverage, cloud-native deployment, and no WSUS dependency. The price comparison is only valid when the platforms are evaluated for equivalent capability and infrastructure requirements.

View SolarWinds Patch Manager pricing

Subscription — 250 nodes: ~$1,584/year (Annual subscription; third-party and Microsoft patching through WSUS/SCCM)
Subscription — 500 nodes: ~$2,700/year (Annual subscription; same capabilities at higher node count)
Perpetual — 250 nodes: ~$3,617 (license + 1st year maintenance) (One-time license; annual maintenance renewal at ~20-25% of license cost)
Enterprise tiers (1,000–110,000 nodes): Contact SolarWinds (Volume discounts apply; per-node cost decreases at higher tiers)

Verified from the official pricing page on March 17, 2026. View source

What stands out about SolarWinds Patch Manager

SolarWinds Patch Manager is the right tool when a team has already invested in WSUS or SCCM, needs third-party application patching on Windows endpoints, and wants to stay inside the Microsoft patching infrastructure rather than migrate to a cloud-native alternative. The pre-built, pre-tested third-party packages are genuinely useful — they reduce the testing burden that makes raw WSUS third-party patching painful.

SolarWinds Patch Manager is best for

Windows-focused IT teams that already operate WSUS or SCCM infrastructure and need to add third-party application patching, compliance reporting, and advanced scheduling without replacing their existing Microsoft patching workflow. It is strongest in regulated environments where audit-ready patch compliance reports and the ability to control exactly which patches deploy through existing infrastructure matter more than cross-platform coverage or cloud-native convenience.

Why SolarWinds Patch Manager stands out

SolarWinds Patch Manager stands out because it does not try to replace WSUS or SCCM — it extends them. The pre-built, pre-tested third-party update packages for applications like Adobe, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Oracle Java, and Apple iTunes are built by SolarWinds, tested against common environments, and delivered through the same WSUS or SCCM infrastructure the team already manages. The custom package wizard lets administrators build deployment packages for any MSI, MSP, or EXE without SCUP or scripting — which is a genuine time-saver for teams that need to deploy internal or niche applications through WSUS.

Commercial fit for SolarWinds Patch Manager

SolarWinds Patch Manager's commercial fit depends entirely on whether WSUS or SCCM is already deployed and whether the endpoint estate is predominantly Windows. When both conditions are true, the subscription pricing is competitive — substantially cheaper per node than cloud-native alternatives like Automox or NinjaOne. When either condition is false, the total cost of ownership balloons: WSUS infrastructure has to be built and maintained, or cross-OS coverage has to come from a second tool.

What users think

“Patch management for Windows environments integrated with WSUS and SCCM, adding third-party application patching beyond what Microsoft's native tooling covers. On-prem deployment and Windows exclusivity limit it to organizations with existing Windows infrastructure management and no requirement for macOS or Linux coverage.”

Read full review

In depth

SolarWinds Patch Manager is best evaluated in the context of the specific it operations software workflows your team is trying to standardize or improve.

Shortlist quality depends less on surface-level feature parity and more on how well SolarWinds Patch Manager fits your deployment preferences, reporting expectations, and the amount of day-to-day operational ownership your team can absorb. Use this page to understand product fit before moving into direct vendor comparisons.

  • Test whether SolarWinds Patch Manager fits the current environment and OS mix.
  • Validate the vendor’s pricing mechanics against real rollout assumptions.
  • Check whether the platform solves the workflows that matter in the first 90 days.

SolarWinds Patch Manager features

Third-party application patching through WSUS and SCCM

The core capability of SolarWinds Patch Manager is extending WSUS and SCCM to handle third-party applications. SolarWinds builds, tests, and automatically delivers update packages for hundreds of commonly deployed Windows applications — Adobe Acrobat, Reader, and Flash; Google Chrome; Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird; Oracle Java; Apple iTunes and QuickTime; 7-Zip; Notepad++; VLC Media Player; and dozens more. - Packages are published to the WSUS or SCCM catalog and deploy through the same approval workflows, distribution points, and maintenance windows the team already uses for Microsoft patches.

Custom package creation

The custom package wizard allows administrators to create deployment packages for any Windows application distributed as an MSI, MSP, or EXE — without using SCUP (System Center Updates Publisher) or writing PowerShell deployment scripts. This is particularly useful for internal applications, legacy line-of-business software, and niche tools that are not covered by the pre-built catalog. - Custom packages deploy through WSUS or SCCM just like pre-built updates: same approval process, same maintenance windows, same compliance reporting.

Patch compliance reporting

SolarWinds Patch Manager provides pre-built and customizable reports covering patch status across the managed fleet, missing critical patches by device and by severity, deployment history with success and failure rates, and vulnerability exposure windows. Reports can be scheduled for automatic delivery to stakeholders — useful for weekly compliance summaries and audit preparation. - The reporting engine integrates with SolarWinds Orion for organizations running other SolarWinds products, which means patch compliance data can appear alongside infrastructure health metrics in a unified dashboard.

Advanced scheduling and maintenance windows

Patch deployment scheduling in SolarWinds Patch Manager supports precise maintenance window definition, phased rollouts by device group or organizational unit, severity-based prioritization, and configurable reboot behavior including forced reboot, deferred reboot with user notification, and reboot suppression. - Scheduling integrates with WSUS and SCCM maintenance windows, so administrators can manage all patching schedules from Patch Manager without duplicating window definitions.

Microsoft patch management through WSUS

While WSUS handles Microsoft patch deployment on its own, SolarWinds Patch Manager adds a management layer that improves visibility and control. Patch Manager provides a cleaner view of Microsoft patch status across the fleet, better reporting on which devices are missing critical Microsoft updates, and the ability to manage Microsoft and third-party patches from a single console rather than switching between the WSUS console and a separate third-party patching tool. - The value here is operational consolidation and visibility — not new patching capability.

Pros and cons of SolarWinds Patch Manager

This is the point in the evaluation where buyers should separate what sounds strong in the demo from what will still matter after implementation, reporting setup, and day-two administration are real.

Strengths

These are the strengths most likely to keep SolarWinds Patch Manager in the shortlist once the team starts comparing practical fit, not just feature breadth.

Pre-built third-party packages eliminate the testing burden

SolarWinds builds, tests, and automatically delivers update packages for hundreds of third-party applications — Adobe, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Oracle Java, Apple iTunes, and more.

Compliance reporting is audit-ready out of the box

Patch compliance reports in SolarWinds Patch Manager are detailed enough to satisfy most regulatory audit requirements without custom report building. Pre-built reports cover patch status across the fleet, missing critical patches, deployment history by device and by patch, and vulnerability exposure windows. For organizations in healthcare, financial services, or government that face regular compliance audits, this reporting capability reduces the manual effort of proving patch status from hours to minutes.

Leverages existing WSUS and SCCM infrastructure investment

Instead of requiring a new agent, a new console, and a new deployment architecture, SolarWinds Patch Manager uses the WSUS and SCCM infrastructure the team has already built. Patches — including third-party packages — deploy through the same distribution points, maintenance windows, and approval workflows the team already understands.

Custom package wizard for internal and niche applications

The custom package wizard lets administrators create deployment packages for any MSI, MSP, or EXE file without using SCUP or writing complicated deployment scripts. This is practically useful for organizations that deploy internal applications, legacy line-of-business software, or niche tools that are not covered by SolarWinds' pre-built catalog. The packages deploy through WSUS or SCCM just like any other update — same approval process, same maintenance windows, same reporting.

Advanced scheduling and maintenance window control

Patch deployment scheduling supports tight maintenance windows, phased rollouts by device group, severity-based prioritization, and configurable reboot behavior. For environments where patching during business hours is not acceptable — healthcare systems, financial trading platforms, manufacturing control systems — the ability to schedule precisely when patches deploy and when reboots occur is operationally critical. This is a feature that WSUS provides at a basic level; Patch Manager extends it with more granular control and better visibility into scheduled versus completed deployments.

Limitations

These are the points worth pressing in pricing calls, technical validation, and rollout planning before the team treats the product as a safe choice.

Windows-only — no macOS, Linux, or mobile device coverage

SolarWinds Patch Manager patches Windows endpoints exclusively. There is no macOS agent, no Linux support, and no mobile device management. Any organization with a mixed-OS environment needs a second patching tool for non-Windows devices — which means a second console, a second workflow, and a second cost line.

Requires existing WSUS or SCCM infrastructure — not standalone

SolarWinds Patch Manager does not function without WSUS or SCCM. It is an extension, not a replacement. Organizations that do not already run WSUS or SCCM would need to build and maintain that infrastructure before Patch Manager adds any value — a significant infrastructure and personnel investment.

Dated interface and steep learning curve

The Patch Manager console has not been meaningfully redesigned in years. Reviewer feedback across G2, Capterra, and PeerSpot consistently notes that the interface feels outdated, icons and symbols are confusing without documentation, and the terminology mapping between SolarWinds concepts and Windows Update concepts is poorly explained. New administrators should expect a meaningful ramp-up period — particularly for third-party package configuration and custom package creation.

Third-party patching setup is time-consuming

While the pre-built packages are a genuine time-saver once configured, the initial setup of third-party patching through WSUS or SCCM requires extensive testing. Reviewers report that configuring third-party update sources, validating packages against their specific environment, and troubleshooting deployment failures during initial rollout takes significantly more effort than cloud-native alternatives where third-party patching is turnkey. Budget two to four weeks of testing before relying on third-party patching in production.

SolarWinds brand carries reputational risk from the 2020 breach

The 2020 SolarWinds supply chain attack remains a factor in procurement decisions — particularly in government, defense, and financial services. Some organizations have blanket policies against SolarWinds products regardless of current security posture. This is not a product quality issue, but it is a buying process reality that can eliminate SolarWinds Patch Manager from consideration before technical evaluation begins.

SolarWinds Patch Manager deployment, integrations, and platform coverage

SolarWinds Patch Manager requires an existing WSUS or SCCM deployment. The Patch Manager server installs on a Windows Server instance and connects to your WSUS or SCCM infrastructure to extend it with third-party patching, advanced scheduling, and compliance reporting.

Installation is straightforward for administrators who already manage WSUS — the installer configures the connection to the WSUS server, sets up the third-party update catalog, and begins syncing available packages. For teams without WSUS experience, expect the WSUS prerequisite setup to take longer than the Patch Manager installation itself.

Third-party patching is the primary implementation effort. After the base installation, administrators must configure which third-party applications to track, validate the pre-built packages against their environment, set approval policies, and test deployment on a pilot group before rolling out to the full fleet.

SolarWinds provides user cookbooks and guided documentation for this process that reviewers describe as well-done and practical. Still, budget two to four weeks of testing before trusting third-party patching in production — especially for applications with complex installation dependencies.

Before you book a demo

SolarWinds Patch Manager free trial and buying motion

SolarWinds Patch Manager should be evaluated against one threshold question before any feature comparison: does the team already run WSUS or SCCM, and does the endpoint estate justify staying on that infrastructure? If both answers are yes, Patch Manager is a practical extension. If either answer is no, the evaluation should shift to cloud-native alternatives that do not carry the WSUS dependency.

1

Confirm that WSUS or SCCM is already deployed, maintained, and staffed before evaluating Patch Manager. The product has no value without that infrastructure. If WSUS exists but is poorly maintained or running on outdated server versions, factor the remediation cost into the total cost of ownership — Patch Manager will not fix a broken WSUS deployment.

2

Use the 30-day trial to test third-party patching against the actual application catalog in your environment. Deploy the pre-built packages for your top 10 third-party applications on a pilot group and track deployment success rate, reboot behavior, and reporting accuracy. That test tells you more than any demo or feature list.

3

Compare the subscription cost against cloud-native alternatives at full infrastructure cost — not just the license price. SolarWinds Patch Manager is cheaper per node than Automox or Action1, but only if WSUS infrastructure costs are excluded. If the team is already budgeting for WSUS server maintenance, that cost is sunk. If WSUS needs to be built or upgraded, add that cost to the SolarWinds total before comparing.

4

Ask whether the Windows-only limitation is acceptable for the next three years, not just today. If the endpoint estate is trending toward macOS adoption, cloud-native infrastructure, or remote-first deployment where WSUS distribution points are impractical, a cloud-native patching tool may be a better long-term investment even if it costs more per node in year one.

Frequently asked questions about SolarWinds Patch Manager

How much does SolarWinds Patch Manager cost?

+

SolarWinds Patch Manager subscription licensing starts at approximately $1,584 per year for 250 nodes based on reseller pricing. Perpetual licensing with first-year maintenance starts at approximately $3,617 for 250 nodes. Eleven node tiers are available scaling up to 110,000 nodes. A 30-day free trial is available. Contact SolarWinds or an authorized reseller for current pricing at your specific node count.

Does SolarWinds Patch Manager require WSUS?

+

Yes. SolarWinds Patch Manager is an extension of WSUS or SCCM, not a standalone product. It uses existing WSUS or SCCM infrastructure to deploy both Microsoft and third-party patches. Without WSUS or SCCM, Patch Manager has nothing to extend and cannot function. If you do not have WSUS deployed, evaluate cloud-native alternatives like Automox, Action1, or NinjaOne instead.

Does SolarWinds Patch Manager support macOS or Linux?

+

No. SolarWinds Patch Manager is Windows-only. It does not patch macOS, Linux, or mobile devices. Teams with mixed-OS environments need a second patching tool for non-Windows endpoints or should evaluate cross-platform alternatives like Automox or NinjaOne that handle Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single console.

Does SolarWinds Patch Manager offer a free trial?

+

Yes. SolarWinds offers a 30-day free trial of Patch Manager. Use the trial to test third-party package deployment through your WSUS infrastructure, validate compliance reporting, and confirm that the pre-built packages cover the applications that matter most in your environment.

What third-party applications does SolarWinds Patch Manager support?

+

SolarWinds Patch Manager includes pre-built, pre-tested update packages for hundreds of third-party applications including Adobe Acrobat and Reader, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Oracle Java, Apple iTunes, 7-Zip, Notepad++, and many more. The custom package wizard also allows administrators to build deployment packages for any MSI, MSP, or EXE application not covered by the pre-built catalog.

Is SolarWinds Patch Manager worth it after the 2020 breach?

+

The 2020 supply chain attack targeted SolarWinds Orion, not Patch Manager specifically. SolarWinds has since overhauled its build pipeline, security practices, and code-signing process. Whether the product is worth evaluating depends on your organization's vendor security policies. Some procurement teams — particularly in government and defense — have blanket restrictions. Confirm that SolarWinds passes your vendor security review before investing evaluation time in the product.

How does SolarWinds Patch Manager compare to Automox?

+

SolarWinds Patch Manager extends WSUS or SCCM with third-party patching for Windows only. Automox is a cloud-native platform that patches Windows, macOS, and Linux without WSUS dependency. SolarWinds is cheaper per node but requires existing Microsoft infrastructure. Automox costs more but includes cross-OS coverage, cloud-native deployment, and no on-premises infrastructure requirement. The right choice depends on whether WSUS is already deployed and whether Windows-only coverage is acceptable.

SolarWinds Patch Manager alternatives worth comparing

If SolarWinds Patch Manager is on the shortlist but the WSUS dependency, Windows-only limitation, or SolarWinds brand concern is creating friction, compare it against these alternatives before committing. The most useful comparison axis is not feature count — it is whether the team's infrastructure and OS mix justify staying on WSUS or migrating to a cloud-native patching model.

Automox

Automox is the most direct cloud-native alternative to SolarWinds Patch Manager. It patches Windows, macOS, and Linux from a single cloud console with no WSUS dependency. Pricing starts at approximately $3 per device per month — more expensive per node than SolarWinds, but eliminates WSUS infrastructure costs entirely. Compare it when the team is evaluating whether to stay on WSUS or migrate to a cloud-native patching model.

Open alternative

Atera

Atera gives teams a way to evaluate RMM software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.

Open alternative

Action1

Action1 is a cloud-native patch management platform with a permanently free tier for up to 200 endpoints. It handles Windows, macOS, and Linux patching with peer-to-peer patch distribution and deploys in under five minutes with no infrastructure requirements. Compare it to SolarWinds when the team wants to test cloud-native patching before committing to a paid subscription or when the endpoint count is under 200.

Open alternative

Pulseway

Pulseway gives teams a way to evaluate RMM software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.

Open alternative

ManageEngine Endpoint Central

ManageEngine Endpoint Central combines patch management with endpoint management, MDM, and OS deployment. Published pricing starting around $795 per year for 50 endpoints. Handles Windows, macOS, and Linux patching plus mobile device management. Compare it to SolarWinds when cross-platform coverage and published pricing are priorities.

Open alternative
See all SolarWinds Patch Manager alternatives

Head-to-head comparisons

Open the comparison pages once SolarWinds Patch Manager makes the shortlist.

Related buyer guides

Use the surrounding category research before this tool becomes the default answer.

Buyer guide

Patch Management Policy Template

A patch management policy template helps teams define scope, ownership, cadence, and exception handling before software or audit pressure exposes gaps in the workflow.

Read article

Buyer guide

Patch Management System

A patch management system should turn updates into a governable process with cleaner approvals, reporting, coverage visibility, and less manual remediation.

Read article

Sources

These are the public references, pricing pages, and editorial inputs used to support this page. Readers should still confirm final commercial or product details directly with the vendor when the decision becomes real.

Continue through this software cluster

Use the linked pages below to move from the product profile into pricing, alternatives, category context, comparisons, glossary terms, and research.

Patch Management

Return to the category hub when the team needs broader buying context before narrowing further.

Open the glossary

Use glossary terms when the product page raises category language that needs a clearer operational definition.