Action1 vs SolarWinds Patch Manager compares fit, tradeoffs, and operational strengths for IT buyers.
Editorial policy: How we review software · How rankings work · Sponsored disclosure
This comparison template is designed for shortlist evaluation with a practical, operator-focused lens rather than vendor-led positioning.
Action1 and SolarWinds Patch Manager should be separated by the conditions that matter after rollout, not by whoever tells the smoother story in a demo. Use this page to see which option handles your deployment model, operating constraints, and commercial tradeoffs with less friction.
Action1 gives teams a way to evaluate endpoint management software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.
Endpoint-based pricing, Cloud deployment, Windows operating-system support, and a trial path for early validation.
Action1 is usually a better fit when cloud, endpoint-based, and Windows line up more closely with the environment your team actually needs to support.
SolarWinds Patch Manager gives teams a way to evaluate IT operations software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.
Custom quote pricing, On-prem deployment, Windows operating-system support, and no clearly listed trial path.
SolarWinds Patch Manager is usually a better fit when on-prem, custom quote, and Windows line up more closely with the environment your team actually needs to support.
Use the matrix as the fastest way to isolate hard differences in pricing, deployment, platform coverage, and trial access before you go deeper into rollout and workflow questions.
| Criteria | ProductAction1 | ProductSolarWinds Patch Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Endpoint-based | Custom quote |
| Deployment model | Cloud | On-prem |
| Supported OS | Windows | Windows |
| Free trial | Available | Not listed |
Side-by-side breakdown across 16 features — pricing, deployment, integrations, and the capabilities that separate them in practice.
| Feature | Action1 | SolarWinds Patch Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment model | Cloud-native, no infrastructure | On-premises (extends WSUS/SCCM) |
| Free plan | Yes (up to 100 endpoints) | No (30-day trial) |
| Pricing model | $2/endpoint/mo | Per node (quote-based) |
| WSUS integration | No (replaces WSUS) | Yes (extends and enhances WSUS) |
| Windows patching | Yes | Yes |
| macOS patching | Yes | No |
| Linux patching | Yes | No |
| Third-party app patching | Yes (600+ apps) | Yes (limited catalog) |
| Remote worker support | Yes (cloud, no VPN needed) | Requires VPN for off-premises endpoints |
| Remote script execution | Yes | No |
| Real-time visibility | Yes | Limited (scan-based) |
| Compliance reporting | Yes (NIST, CIS) | Yes (NIST, PCI, HIPAA) |
| On-premises infrastructure | None required | Requires WSUS/SCCM server |
| MSP / multi-tenant | Yes | No |
| Setup complexity | Low (agent-only) | High (WSUS server required) |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 | 4.3/5 |
Action1 vs SolarWinds Patch Manager is a shortlist-stage decision page meant to help IT buyers move from general research into a clearer vendor choice.
Action1 and SolarWinds Patch Manager usually stay on the shortlist for different reasons. Use this page to see where one product fits the current environment more cleanly, where the tradeoffs start to matter, and which differences deserve more pressure-testing before the team treats either option as the default choice.
The better fit depends on deployment preferences, automation needs, and how much operational complexity your team can absorb.
Before booking demos, answer these against your environment. If most resolve cleanly, you are ready to move forward — a smoother sales process is not the same as a better product fit.
Which product matches the team’s current operating model without requiring unnecessary process change?
Which option offers the cleaner path for rollout, onboarding, and long-term operational ownership?
Where do pricing mechanics, integrations, and platform scope create meaningful differences?
If neither option is a perfect fit, which tradeoff is easier to absorb over the next 12 months?
No. Action1 is a cloud-native patch management platform that replaces WSUS entirely. Agents connect directly to Action1's cloud infrastructure for patch delivery — no WSUS server, SCCM, or on-premises infrastructure is required. Action1 can coexist with WSUS during a migration, but its value proposition is eliminating the WSUS dependency.
No. SolarWinds Patch Manager is an on-premises extension of WSUS and SCCM. It requires existing Microsoft infrastructure and does not offer a cloud-native deployment model. Remote endpoint patching through Patch Manager requires VPN or DirectAccess. For cloud-native patch management, Action1 or Automox are more appropriate.
SolarWinds Patch Manager pricing is quote-based, typically running $12–$25/node/year depending on volume and contract terms. For 500 nodes, annual cost is roughly $6,000–$12,500/yr — excluding the cost of WSUS/SCCM infrastructure. Action1 paid is $2/endpoint/mo ($12,000/yr for 500 endpoints), but includes zero infrastructure overhead.
No. SolarWinds Patch Manager extends WSUS and SCCM, both of which are Windows-only. macOS and Linux endpoints require separate patch management tools. Action1 patches Windows, macOS, and Linux from the same cloud console, making it more suitable for mixed-OS environments.
Yes. Action1 agents communicate directly with Action1's cloud infrastructure over HTTPS — no VPN or on-premises network connectivity required. Remote workers patch seamlessly regardless of location. SolarWinds Patch Manager requires endpoints to connect to WSUS, which typically needs VPN for off-premises endpoints.
Yes. Action1 provides a fully functional free plan for up to 100 endpoints, including patch management, third-party app patching (600+ applications), remote scripting, and real-time visibility. SolarWinds Patch Manager has no free plan and requires paid licensing plus existing WSUS/SCCM infrastructure.
Yes. SolarWinds Patch Manager includes compliance reporting aligned to NIST, PCI DSS, and HIPAA — valuable for organizations in regulated industries that need to document patch status against security frameworks. Action1 includes NIST and CIS-aligned reporting. For HIPAA and PCI-specific compliance reports, SolarWinds Patch Manager has a slight advantage.
Yes, during migration. Running Action1 and WSUS in parallel is common when transitioning. Once Action1 agents are deployed to an endpoint, you should disable the WSUS client Group Policy for that endpoint to avoid conflicting patch policies. Full WSUS decommissioning typically follows a 1–3 month parallel run period.
Action1 is significantly easier to set up. Deploy the lightweight agent to endpoints (via GPO, script, or manual install) and management is available immediately from the cloud console. No servers to provision, no database to configure. SolarWinds Patch Manager requires a functioning WSUS installation (or SCCM), which itself requires Windows Server licensing, SQL Server, and meaningful infrastructure configuration.
It depends on what WSUS is missing for your organization. If you need improved third-party patching, better compliance reports, or streamlined patch approval workflows on top of WSUS, SolarWinds Patch Manager adds value. If your main pain points are remote worker patching, cross-platform coverage, or eliminating infrastructure overhead, Action1 or Automox are better alternatives.
Use the software profiles to go deeper on pricing details, integrations, rollout fit, and editorial review before the team commits to a final vendor path.
Action1 gives teams a way to evaluate endpoint management software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.
SolarWinds Patch Manager gives teams a way to evaluate IT operations software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.
Go deeper on product profiles, pricing, category context, and glossary terms before committing to a vendor path.
Return to the category hub when the shortlist still needs broader market context before the final vendor decision.
Check which tools in this category offer free tiers, trials, or community editions.
Open the full product profile for deeper pricing, deployment, review, and shortlist context.
Check commercial fit and pricing mechanics directly before treating the comparison as settled.
Open the full product profile for deeper pricing, deployment, review, and shortlist context.
Check commercial fit and pricing mechanics directly before treating the comparison as settled.
Use glossary terms when the comparison raises category language that still needs a clearer definition.
