Device42 vs Lansweeper compares fit, tradeoffs, and operational strengths for IT buyers.
Editorial policy: How we review software · How rankings work · Sponsored disclosure
Bottom line
Device42
Enterprises needing a CMDB with application dependency mapping, CI relationships for change management, and datacenter rack management should use Device42.
Lansweeper
IT teams that need broad automated network discovery, software audit, and CVE-correlated risk insights at an affordable per-asset price should use Lansweeper.
This comparison template is designed for shortlist evaluation with a practical, operator-focused lens rather than vendor-led positioning.
Device42 and Lansweeper should be separated by the conditions that matter after rollout, not by whoever tells the smoother story in a demo. Use this page to see which option handles your deployment model, operating constraints, and commercial tradeoffs with less friction.
Device42 gives teams a way to evaluate IT operations software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.
Custom quote pricing, Cloud / On-prem deployment, Web operating-system support, and no clearly listed trial path.
Device42 is usually a better fit when cloud / on-prem, custom quote, and Web line up more closely with the environment your team actually needs to support.
Lansweeper gives teams a way to evaluate IT operations software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.
Asset-based pricing, Cloud / On-prem deployment, Web operating-system support, and a trial path for early validation.
Lansweeper is usually a better fit when cloud / on-prem, asset-based, and Web line up more closely with the environment your team actually needs to support.
Use the matrix as the fastest way to isolate hard differences in pricing, deployment, platform coverage, and trial access before you go deeper into rollout and workflow questions.
| Criteria | ProductDevice42 | ProductLansweeper |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Custom quote | Asset-based |
| Deployment model | Cloud / On-prem | Cloud / On-prem |
| Supported OS | Web | Web |
| Free trial | Not listed | Available |
Side-by-side breakdown across 16 features — pricing, deployment, integrations, and the capabilities that separate them in practice.
| Feature | Device42 | Lansweeper |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment model | Virtual appliance (on-premises or IaaS) | Cloud or on-premises |
| Auto-discovery | Agentless — SNMP, WMI, SSH, Nmap, VMware | Agentless — WMI, SNMP, SSH, Nmap |
| CMDB / CI relationships | Full CMDB with CI relationships and impact analysis | Asset inventory without CMDB relationship mapping |
| Application dependency mapping | Yes — automated app-to-infra dependency maps | No dependency mapping |
| Network visualization | Network topology and rack diagrams | Network topology maps |
| Rack / datacenter management | Full rack and datacenter layout management | No rack management |
| IP address management (IPAM) | Built-in IPAM with subnet tracking | IP address inventory from discovery |
| Software license management | Full SAM — license compliance and entitlement | Full software inventory and license compliance |
| Vulnerability scanning | No built-in vulnerability scanner | Lansweeper Risk Insights (CVE correlation) |
| ITSM integration | ServiceNow, Freshservice, Jira deep CMDB sync | ServiceNow, Jira, ServiceDesk Plus integrations |
| Password / secrets vault | Built-in device password vault | No password management |
| Custom reports | Custom CI reports and dashboards | Report designer with many built-in reports |
| Free plan | No | Yes — free for up to 100 assets |
| Pricing | Enterprise (contact sales) | From free; paid ~$1.55/asset/yr |
| Target user | Enterprise IT needing CMDB for ITSM change management | IT teams needing network-wide asset discovery and audit |
| API | REST API for all CMDB data | REST API for asset data |
Device42 vs Lansweeper is a shortlist-stage decision page meant to help IT buyers move from general research into a clearer vendor choice.
Device42 and Lansweeper usually stay on the shortlist for different reasons. Use this page to see where one product fits the current environment more cleanly, where the tradeoffs start to matter, and which differences deserve more pressure-testing before the team treats either option as the default choice.
The better fit depends on deployment preferences, automation needs, and how much operational complexity your team can absorb.
Before booking demos, answer these against your environment. If most resolve cleanly, you are ready to move forward — a smoother sales process is not the same as a better product fit.
Which product matches the team’s current operating model without requiring unnecessary process change?
Which option offers the cleaner path for rollout, onboarding, and long-term operational ownership?
Where do pricing mechanics, integrations, and platform scope create meaningful differences?
If neither option is a perfect fit, which tradeoff is easier to absorb over the next 12 months?
An asset inventory (like Lansweeper provides) catalogs what assets exist on the network with their properties. A CMDB (like Device42) additionally maps relationships between configuration items — showing which applications depend on which servers, how network changes affect other systems. CMDBs power change management; inventories power audits.
No. Lansweeper discovers and inventories assets but does not map application-to-infrastructure dependencies. Device42 automatically creates dependency maps showing which servers and databases each application relies on — critical for change impact analysis.
Yes. Lansweeper is free for up to 100 assets. This is useful for small environments or evaluation. Device42 has no free tier and requires a sales engagement. For budget-sensitive teams, Lansweeper's free plan or low per-asset pricing is a significant advantage.
Both tools provide software inventory and license compliance. Lansweeper's Risk Insights adds CVE correlation to the software inventory, identifying vulnerable software installations. Device42's SAM focuses on license entitlement compliance without native vulnerability correlation.
Yes. Device42 includes visual rack diagrams showing which physical devices occupy which rack units in each cabinet and datacenter room. Lansweeper does not include datacenter or rack management.
Yes. Lansweeper Risk Insights correlates discovered software inventory against CVE databases to identify vulnerable software versions across the fleet. Device42 does not include built-in vulnerability correlation.
Yes. Device42 includes full IP address management with subnet tracking, IP availability dashboards, and MAC address mapping. Lansweeper discovers IP addresses as part of its inventory but does not provide full IPAM functionality.
Device42 has a deep ServiceNow CMDB integration that syncs CIs, relationships, and dependencies into ServiceNow's CMDB in real time. Lansweeper integrates with ServiceNow for asset data but the integration is shallower. For ServiceNow CMDB population, Device42 is the preferred choice.
Yes. Some organizations use Lansweeper for broad network discovery and software audit (especially at lower cost for large networks) while using Device42 for the CMDB layer — importing Lansweeper data into Device42 for relationship mapping and change management.
Lansweeper Cloud for 5,000 assets costs approximately $7,750/year ($1.55/asset/year). Device42 pricing for 5,000 devices requires a sales quote but is typically in the $20,000–$50,000+/year range depending on modules. Lansweeper is significantly more affordable for discovery and inventory use cases.
Use the software profiles to go deeper on pricing details, integrations, rollout fit, and editorial review before the team commits to a final vendor path.
Device42 gives teams a way to evaluate IT operations software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.
Lansweeper gives teams a way to evaluate IT operations software fit, deployment tradeoffs, and day-to-day operational usability.
Go deeper on product profiles, pricing, category context, and glossary terms before committing to a vendor path.
Return to the category hub when the shortlist still needs broader market context before the final vendor decision.
Check which tools in this category offer free tiers, trials, or community editions.
Open the full product profile for deeper pricing, deployment, review, and shortlist context.
Check commercial fit and pricing mechanics directly before treating the comparison as settled.
Open the full product profile for deeper pricing, deployment, review, and shortlist context.
Check commercial fit and pricing mechanics directly before treating the comparison as settled.
Use glossary terms when the comparison raises category language that still needs a clearer definition.
